"At the centre of Russian Oil and Gas industry news..."
New Account

The Magazine

Issue 5

This is a short description of the magazine.

E-magazine
  • Previous Issues

Blog

Spencer Green
Chairman, GDS International

Sales and the 'Talent Magnet'

A lot is written about being a ‘Talent Magnet’, either as a company, or as President. It’s all good practice – listen, mentor, reward, provide clear goals and career maps. Good practice for the employer, but what about the employee?
24 May 2011

Embracing the communications revolution

No Comments

By Neil Davey

While the communication requirements for the oil and gas sector are generally the same as any other industry, there are some intrinsic differences that set it apart. Certainly the environment in which many oil and gas firms operate is a critical consideration. Platforms, pipelines and rigs often function in harsh or remote environments. And not only must the telecom technology be robust enough to survive the inhospitable conditions but it must also be reliable to ensure that those working on-site can operate both successfully and safely.

“In terms of the research and exploration of new fields, there is an increasing tendency to go deeper and deeper into the sea and to more distant areas with harsh environmental conditions,” highlights Alcatel’s Energy Market Director, Stephane Terranova. “This is combined with a shortage of skilled personnel to operate all of the fields. And so we are noticing a trend in these companies ensuring that their remote operations have an inland operation and these obviously need to be based, in both cases, on a reliable communications system.”

“The main thing for a lot of these oil companies is lift cost – how much does it cost to get one barrel of oil out of the ground,” adds Mike Rust, Client Delivery Executive, Telecoms, at EDS. “They are measured against each other in the open market in terms of how good their lift costs are. Communications is an enabler to lowering those lift costs. If communications are strong, they can cut the lift costs by a huge margin.”

But while reliable communication is a prerequisite for efficient operation and health and safety, it is also increasingly important in a broader corporate sense. “The whole path from the flow source through to the actual selling is now inextricably linked in such a way that as soon as the oil comes out of the ground the stock market is informed of what each oil company is producing,” continues Rust. “You still hear a lot of people talking about the reserves that firms have, but the actual flow of the material is now one of the key things that affects the stock price. Communication is the way that they get that information, whether that is by satellite, fibre, wireless of whatever. So communications is also essential in a broader picture that affects revenue.”

Lagging behind

With such a great deal resting on reliable communications from such challenging environments, it would be assumed that the oil and gas sector would have ensured that it had rolled out cutting-edge telecom services to address its needs. However, the sector has earned a reputation for being a slow adopter of new technology outside of its core business. And so it is with communication technologies.

“If you compare the oil and gas industry to other sectors in terms of deployment of technology to drive the business forward and gain benefits and competitive advantages, it is well behind industries such as financial services for instance,” suggests Stuart Robinson, Business Development Manager, Oil and Gas, Cisco Systems EMEA. “Oil and gas firms will potentially innovate to drive some benefits in the enterprise side of business. But when it comes to operations, it is step-by-step. In terms of investment in communications, it is lagging behind other industries.”

However, with rising communication demands, oil and gas companies are increasingly realising that their old legacy communication systems and infrastructures are no longer meeting their requirements. “They are often working with analogue systems, many of which have been installed long ago and which are operating in difficult environments and which are, in most cases, not using very advanced redundancy systems,” highlights Terranova. “This can create reliability problems and when you can’t communicate with the platform or get the information along the pipeline it means that you have to reduce or stop operation. This is costly.” There are also capacity and flexibility limitations.

“The industry needs to send more and more information on the communication pipe but most of the legacy systems are not able to cope with the increased flow of information in real-time,” continues Terranova. “Firms also increasingly want to put different kinds of applications on their communication systems, not only using communication for pure voice or data, but also SCADA and other applications such as video surveillance or leak protection. And for this you need to have a flexible system on which you can plug all these applications, such as a modern IP system.”

Rust has witnessed similar limitations in the sector. “In remote and harsh locations satellite bandwidth has always been a problem,” he explains. “In Russia, hitting some of the satellite providers is quite difficult so the links can be relatively slow. So they are limited by the speed of the link and also the reliability of those links. Even in a lot of the well-developed areas, they are still running on fairly old technology and these analogue systems are hampering their ability to move information around. And not only in standard communications, but also on board the offshore platforms – for example, a lot of the maritime and management systems to contact the Navy and the Coastguard are fairly old now, and a lot of these need to be developed now into new digital and wireless-based systems.”

Enhanced measurement

But after much deliberation on the part of many operators, an overhaul and upgrading of legacy communication systems is now under way in the industry. A total replacement of analogue with digital is being witnessed across the sector, while fibre backbones are being installed. Wide-band digital radio links and wide-band VSAT links are similarly becoming increasingly commonplace as the industry reacts to the new communication demands being placed upon it. And the benefits are already being felt amongst the earliest adopters.

“There probably would have been some 20-30 different networks inside a typical oil and gas company such as BP – all voice networks, all different PSTNs, utilising multiple sets of providers and carriers as it’s a global business,” says Robinson. “But now the networks are being converged, running multiple different applications over a single unified Ethernet network. So there is a move from PABX to a hybrid PABX to a pure IP converged Ethernet network, and then voice is run right across a global network. And that both takes cost out and delivers significant operational efficiency.”

In recent years, through the applied use of enhanced measurement technologies, there has been an exponential increase in well and pipeline data. To increase productivity, firms are ensuring that engineers, wherever they may be located, have real-time access to this data for analysis and immediate intervention. “Oil and gas companies have wellhead automation systems supported by a wi-fi network, which gathers the SCADA information integrated with a fibre optic backbone which brings the data to the control centre,” says Terranova. “So you are talking about a combination of wireless technology like wi-fi and WiMAX coupled with fibre optic terrestrial or submarine.”

Drawing on the real-time information and gathering it back on shore is being supported by the increasing amounts of fibre optic that is being laid in areas around the world. Transneft has reportedly been looking to upgrade to pure fibre optics from copper over the next ten years, whilst BT has laid 100 Mg fibre all the way around the Caspian Sea, connecting the wells in the Sea, with satellite links as a back-up. The huge bandwidth of fibre optic in particular is driving the emergence of on-shore control rooms or collaboration centres as firms look to reduce the number of workers on platforms. It costs US$600,000 to have one man on one platform for one year according to estimates, and so de-manning platforms will cut costs.

Safety solutions

Of course, fewer workers on installations is a benefit not only to the bottom line, but also in terms of safety. And the latest communications solutions are certainly impacting safety. “The application of CCTV cameras on high-speed links has meant that firms no longer need to send a team member out on a helicopter to check on a potential problem with fire on a platform, for instance,” highlights Rust. “Now they can put CCTV on the main areas and watch it on their behalf and tackle it in a different way. CCTV is also on the pipelines, and a lot of the data is now taken straight from the pressure areas on the pipeline and is transmitted back so that nobody has to go to these locations and take readings any more. So it is keeping the man as much away from the potential sources of danger as possible. There are also new wireless over Ethernet systems that allow ships to communicate better and beaconing systems that are digitised so that if someone goes overboard you don’t necessarily have to see them to know about it as you have automatic beacons that go off as soon as someone hits the water.”

With such modern applications gradually creeping into the sector, there are clear indications that the oil and gas industry is ready to cast aside its reputation as a slow adopter of new technologies and embrace the operational benefits. Modern telecom facilities are providing financial savings, improving quality, increasing quantity, increasing safety, enabling manpower reduction and improving the environment. Reliable telecom has always been critical to the sector, but as more firms adopt the latest and fastest communication technologies, the nearer we are to the tipping point where fully digital, high-speed, wide band services are a must to stay competitive.

Robinson believes we are already there. “I think we have hit the inflection point right now,” he emphasises. “Everybody has been talking about the oilfield of the future, the digital oil field, the e-field and smart operations for years. But we are now in a situation where we can actually provide deliverables.” “Now the oil and gas industry is taking the digital world very seriously,” agrees Terranova. “You only have to go to conferences and show to be convinced of this. And this is a trend that will continue. The main benefit for them will be optimisation of resources and being able to work in all these environments without having to put heavy resources on the spot. So the key words are: productivity, efficiency and security.”


Mikhail Rybachenkov, President of the Russian Tetra Forum, discusses the evolving role of TETRA communications in the oil and gas sector.

O&G. Oil and gas companies are increasingly realising that their legacy systems are no longer meeting their requirements. What are the main limitations of these communication systems?

MR. Analogue trunking systems have limitations on data capabilities (no Voice and Data at one time; no Packet Data with the possible services based on that transport layer; very limited Short Data Messages service, etc.) and terminals with full duplex feature are very rarely available. In conventional analogue systems there are also added limitations on capacity on the same amount of working channels, on features, on spectrum efficiency usage and on system management features. Usually, for data transfer in analogue conventional systems, dedicated data radio are used and voice and data at the same time are not possible.

O&G. How suitable is a standard like TETRA for Russia¹s burgeoning oil and gas sector?

MR. The feature set that TETRA technology offers better meets the key user requirements of oil and gas sector in Russia than any other technology available on the market:
• Instant and group communication for day-to-day operations and emergency situations – regular profession mobile radio (PMR) functions;
• Dispatcher functions;
• Data capabilities (both packed data and short data messaging) – for SCADA, intranet, GPS based and other data applications;
• Full duplex for telephony – very important in the areas where there is no other communication systems, no public operators.
• Intrinsically safe terminals (that meets ATEX standard);
• Direct Mode Operation (DMO) function that allows to terminals to work without infrastructure.
• High security level of communications due to the standard itself and due to the options of encryption that are available

O&G. How does TETRA meet the demands for operating in unpopulated areas and managing facilities dispersed over long distances?

MR. Initially, when TETRA was introduced to the market, many experts were concerned that with TDMA technology and power limitations (1W for portables, 3W for mobile terminals) it would need many more base stations than with analogue FDMA technologies. The other concern was that one TETRA carrier (that consists of four time slots), which is the minimum capacity of the base station, would be too much, especially for the unpopulated areas. In the early and mid 90s a lot MPT1327 systems were built in Russia for Oil and Gas users and several thousands of users are still using it. I can say that the coverage of these analogue systems for 1 watt portable terminal is not better that for the TETRA terminal. The fact is that the real coverage for TDMA TETRA is even better than FDMA with the same power of terminals (due to the more sophisticated antenna systems and corrections algorithms).
All four time slots may be used very effectively even in the areas with a low number if users if the system resource is used also for data applications (like SCADA systems etc). That means that this minimum capacity of the base station in TETRA (one carrier – four time slots) may be effective even in unpopulated areas. It is also important not to forget about DMO function that allows to terminals to work without infrastructure.

O&G. Could you provide us with some examples of how TETRA has been employed in the oil and gas industry?

MR. Yes, of course. It is used in Sakhalin Island for the project Sakhlin 1 (Exxon Neftegaz Limited) for the communications both on the platform and on the land operation. It is used by Salym Petroleum (Shell) in the Khanty-Mansyisk region. It is used by Sibneft (in Noyabrsk region). It would have been much more but due to the regulatory slowdown in 2004/2005 (new Communication Low, administrative reform) some users have not been able to get frequency permits for TETRA yet.

O&G. Are there any other particular communication technologies that you believe are proving particularly successful at improving safety or efficiency in the oil and gas sector?

MR. I think that analogue PMR technologies are still very competitive if there is no need for data and full duplex operations. The demand for these technologies is still very high, especially due to the fact that it is much easier and faster to obtain necessary frequency permits for it.

O&G. How do you forecast communication capabilities will evolve in the oil and gas sector in the future and what role do you believe TETRA will play in this?

I strongly believe that PMR communications will continue to grow in the oil and gas sector as most of these companies have to increase the level of security, the level of efficiency of the business processes, etc. Another important fact is that most of the oil and gas users have already realised that PMR and Cellular are not competitive but complimentary technologies. Public Cellular cannot serve the technological and security needs of the users as they need instant and group communications, reserved capacity of the infrastructure for the emergency situations. TETRA has the unique feature set that allows to use one transport layer for voice and data communication with the priority on the emergency communications and reliability. This proposition is real value and the level of the demand proves that customers in Russia have already realised that and really want TETRA. The only problem is a very long and complex procedure of obtaining frequency permits. But I hope this that year (after the reform of the Government structure and new Communication Low in Russia that come into force in 2004) the new algorithm will become clear to the market.


More like this...

Disclaimer: All comments posted in a personal capacity
POST A COMMENT
In order to post a comment you need to be regsitered and signed in.
Register | Sign in
No Comments Have Been Submitted
Disclaimer: All comments posted in a personal capacity